Thursday, November 18, 2010
Bristol Palin on Dancing with the Stars
Wednesday, November 10, 2010
Blueprint LSAT Prep Expands
Thursday, October 28, 2010
Education News interview with Jodi Triplett
Tuesday, October 26, 2010
LSAT Testing Centers
When you take the LSAT, you might be in a hotel, you might be in a lecture hall, you might be in a dance hall (seriously). And, despite what your parents may have told you, not all LSAT centers are created equally. Things that can make a testing center better or worse are seating arrangements (tables are generally better than desks, sparse rooms provide less opportunity for distractions than cramped sardine can-like rooms) and noise (being in the middle of a forest sounds pretty good; being under a highway, not so much). This might sound sort of silly, but a couple of years ago an LSAT was administered in a hotel near LAX that was having a Harley convention the same day.
If you’re in a Blueprint class, then we’ve already sent you an email telling you about the historically best centers near you. Make sure you sign up for these early, as the good ones go quick. If you haven’t yet signed up for the LSAT, though, it’s probably the case that the great centers are gone. So are the good ones. So are the close ones. In fact, LSAC can make you drive up to 100 miles to a testing center. Fun way to start the morning when you’re taking the LSAT.
If you’re in one of these less-than-desirable locales, then we’re here for you. Read on.
So what can I do about it, Jodi Triplett?
Glad you asked. If your center of choice is all filled up, then you have to pick a different center, as long as something is open within a hundred miles of you. They’ll only consider opening closed centers once everything within that radius is booked.
So one choice is to bite the bullet, register at a distant center, and wake up early to drive there the morning of the test. You could also consider getting a hotel the night before, as long as you think you’ll be able to get a good night’s sleep in an unfamiliar bed.
But if you’ve got your heart set on a specific location, you’ve got some work to do. First of all, you need to be regularly checking the LSAC website to look out for opening spots. This has been very successful for many individuals. Perhaps you can have a window open on your desktop that you toggle to a few times per hour to refresh. As students cancel their registrations, spots open.
If it’s been too long, and seats still aren’t opening (the last day to register, with late fee, is 9/4), then you can go ahead and take a seat in a center you don’t really want. But you then go back to checking the LSAC website multiple times per day for openings in your center of choice. The only problem now is that you’ll incur a $34 switching fee. But considering the benefits of a good center, that seems to be worth every cent.
If everything within your 100 mile radius is totally full, the rules start to change. You can sign up, but you get on a waiting list. LSAC says that they’ll do their best to put you in your desired locale, but they generally just throw you in the first spot that has an opening within the blast zone. And, just because they love you, LSAC doesn’t let you be registered at one center and on a waiting list for another; you’ve got to choose.
A dirty little secret is that you can actually take the test wherever you want. If you’re registered at one location, you can show up at any disclosed location and hope that there are open seats. If some people don’t show up the day of the test, you can take their spot. This almost always works, but is still extremely risky, because if it doesn’t work, you’re really, really screwed. As such, this method does not come highly recommended.
So what’s an LSAT student to do?
In our opinion, your best bet is to just take the closest center that you can, and then try to forget about it. The absolute most important factor is how much you study, and your seat size or driving distance isn’t going to mean a damn thing if you don’t know a circular argument from a sufficient assumption.
However, if you can’t keep yourself from freaking the hell out about taking the test anywhere but your desired center, then Jodi Triplett’s advice is to hold out a couple more days and try to sign up on the 3rd or 4th of September. Why? Well, that’s the deadline to change dates or pull out of the test all together. During these days a swarm of registrants will be canceling for various and unimportant reasons, so there will be spaces opening up. Spend these days refreshing LSAC’s website to get a center (bear in mind that other people are doing the same thing, though, so be patient and diligent).
But while you wait, may we suggest that you go get yourself some Rum Raisin ice cream. It’s the most underappreciated ice cream there is.
Tuesday, October 19, 2010
So You Want to Go to Law School
Saturday, September 25, 2010
Jodi Triplett's interview with Admissions Dean
Friday, September 24, 2010
The Defenders
Friday, September 17, 2010
Blueprint: The Movie 2.0, part 2.0
Blueprint: The Movie 2.0 continues to blaze a glorious path across the galaxy of interwebs. The latest comet dust sparkling in the reflected light from a nearby star? The Ivey Files. Written by Anna Ivey, law school admissions consultant extraordinaire, the Ivey files give sage advice about everything from letters of recommendation to applying with a DUI. Ms. Ivey kindly put up a post written by my very own self (Jodi Triplett) about Blueprint's newest online LSAT course. You can view samples on the Blueprint youtube page or check out the Blueprint website for more information. It is, in my very biased opinion, amazingness in video form.
Sunday, September 12, 2010
Blueprint: The Movie 2.0
Tuesday, September 7, 2010
Studying for the October LSAT
Thursday, September 2, 2010
A Golden Age for Law Professors
Things for legal educators seem to be going quite well right about now. According to the National Jurist, during the latest decade law schools increased faculty by 40% on average, in stark contrast to what’s happening to Humanities faculty these days (they’re being fired a lot). This is good news for law students, as it raises the student-to-faculty ratio and gives the lecturers more time for legal scholarship. But this is also sort of terrible news for students of the law, as this increase is what accounts for nearly half of the tuition increase witnessed in the last decade. You win some, you lose some…
So, would the average law student (or pre-law student) prefer a more intimate setting or a lower price tag? I, Jodi Triplett, walked around and surveyed about eight people, who coincidentally all work in the Blueprint office, and in this very representative sample the answer was a resounding “lower tuition, obviously. Is this a trick question or something?”
Consider this: I swap my thirty-person graduate school class for an identical class, but with ten times the people, and in return I get a grand off my loans. Would I go for it? Jodi Triplett says: definitely. Even if there weren’t a financial incentive, I’d prefer the bigger classes; it’s a lot easier to get away with not doing the reading when you can hide in a gigantic crowd, gchatting the hour away.
But it’s not quite as black-and-white, as it turns out. The National Jurist reports that the increase in faculty is made to satisfy two very different goals. First, there is more and more specialization in the law, and you need more specialists to address and teach the corresponding concepts. Makes sense. But the other big goal they’ve had in mind is to increase their rankings with USNWR. By lowering the student-to-faculty ratio they get ranked higher. That added prestige leads to a higher sticker price for your education. Once again, USNWR is making the world a much better place.
Article by Jodi Triplett
Thursday, August 26, 2010
Matt Riley talks about Blueprint LSAT
Monday, August 23, 2010
Free Blueprint LSAT Help in New York This Weekend
Tuesday, August 17, 2010
Jodi Triplett and the Giant Sequoias
Thursday, August 12, 2010
Taking Your Second Practice LSAT with Jodi Triplett
Back when you took your very first LSAT, you may have not scored all that well, but really, did you care? Your less-than-stellar score could be easily attributed to a number of things, such as insufficient sleep, insufficient focus, or insufficient lack of being hung over (though the real reason is just that the LSAT is super hard, and it was the first time you saw it). But by the time you’re taking your second test, you will have spent quite a bit of time studying. Presumably your score should go up, no? These expectations can make taking your second exam a rather daunting task.
In truth, you should not at all be obsessing over the actual score. You should still have well over a month before you’ll be taking the actual LSAT, and that’s a lot of time to improve. There are some things to be learned from this practice exam, but the numerical score itself isn’t going to one of those helpful tidbits. At the time of the second exam you have yet to acquire all the tools for attacking all the questions, so it really isn’t reflective of what will turn out to be your ultimate score. The truth of the matter is that it’s pretty common for students to have their scores drop on this test, but then they then bounce back up after they’ve learned the remaining concepts, like a rubber ball hurled at a hardwood floor. In this article I, Jodi Triplet, will be will be going over the things in exam two that actually are informative.
The fine print: This advice is geared toward people taking a test for the second time, and who have around a month and a half or more until the test, not for people who are well into their studies and who have taken multiple tests already.
The finer print: If you have taken tons of practice exams without much of a strategy, you might want to rethink your approach…
What you can glean from your test performance:
1. Whether you’ve learned and are internalizing your methods.
When you’ve completed the test, pour over it carefully and identify the questions that require you to utilize the skills you have already acquired. The ones you got right are good indicators of which skills with which you’re probably fairly strong. The ones you missed might indicate weakness in certain areas, areas that should now be reviewed. Luckily, there remains a good deal of time until test day to review and refine the methods that you’re still shaky with.
2. How good you are at ascertaining how well you did.
You need to learn how to predict your score, and every exam you take should be used as practice for this. After you take a test, but before you score it, go through it mentally and try to recall which ones you think you missed. Using all the data you can remember, try to predict your score. Then see how it actually went. If you were way off, try to figure out why it was at such variance with your expectations (for better or worse). By doing this exercise for your practice tests, you will learn how to accurately predict your score on the day of the real test, which will inform your decision as to whether or not you should cancel.
3. How to build your endurance
The LSAT is a long test, and you can’t adequately prep for it by just doing homework here and there for short intervals. Taking practice tests from time to time will force you to do intense hours-long marathons, increasing the focus and stamina that you’ll need for test day.
So as you take and score your second test, remember that the score itself is of little importance. Endurance, prediction, and question-by-question analysis are what matter.
Post by Jodi Triplett
Sunday, August 8, 2010
Watch Blueprint: The Movie on your Phone!
Where were we? Oh yes. You need a phone that has the Android 2.2 operating system that allows you to play Flash. The iphone does NOT fit this category but the Sprint’s HTC Evo does. Read more about the details here.
You may now return to your regularly scheduled activities. Which I hope includes winning a goldfish by throwing a ping pong ball onto a coke bottle.
Post by Jodi Triplett.
Wednesday, August 4, 2010
Law School: It's All Who You Know. Sometimes.
While I, Jodi Triplett, have never been the beneficiary of such a relationship (though once I got a free brownie because my office manager is an amazing cook), it does raise the question about how to feel that such things exist. Should we all throw down our LSAT prep books in disgust and rail at the state of the world? The answer is probably not, and you can check out my article at Vault.com to see why.
Post by Jodi Triplett
Thursday, July 29, 2010
Trent Teti talks about Blueprint LSAT Prep
Posted by Jodi Triplett
Wednesday, July 28, 2010
The Golden Age for Law Professors
So, would the average law student (or pre-law student) prefer a more intimate setting or a lower price tag? I, Jodi Triplett, walked around and surveyed about eight people, who coincidentally all work in the Blueprint office, and in this very representative sample the answer was a resounding “lower tuition, obviously. Is this a trick question or something?”
Consider this: I swap my thirty-person graduate school class for an identical class, but with ten times the people, and in return I get a grand off my loans. Would I go for it? Jodi Triplett says: definitely. Even if there weren’t a financial incentive, I’d prefer the bigger classes; it’s a lot easier to get away with not doing the reading when you can hide in a gigantic crowd, gchatting the hour away.
But it’s not quite as black-and-white, as it turns out. The National Jurist reports that the increase in faculty is made to satisfy two very different goals. First, there is more and more specialization in the law, and you need more specialists to address and teach the corresponding concepts. Makes sense. But the other big goal they’ve had in mind is to increase their rankings with USNWR. By lowering the student-to-faculty ratio they get ranked higher. That added prestige leads to a higher sticker price for your education. Once again, USNWR is making the world a much better place.
By Jodi Triplett
Thursday, July 22, 2010
Why are students still going to law school?
Monday, July 19, 2010
LSAT Advice: Eschew the Facial Tattoo
That thought made me, Jodi Triplett, a bit mystified. Why should McGee’s facial tattoos make us even more condemning of James' adultery? I think the LSAT can shed some light.
Sandra Bullock is an actress known for being in entirely wholesome, middle-of-the-road fare. She’s about as all-American as they come. This might lead one to assume that James is attracted to this type of woman, and thus the next woman he would be with would likely be cut from a similar cloth. Sort of like when Pam Anderson started going out with Kid Rock. This wasn’t much of a surprise to anyone, given the fact that she had previously been with Tommy Lee. She’s clearly got a type; scummy rockers with bad boy reputations. Brad Pitt going from Jennifer to Angelina is still pretty unsurprising – they’re both famous celebrities, and they’re both very attractive. One might be vanilla and the other lemon chiffon, but they’re both variations of cake.
But assuming that this must be the case is highly fallacious, and the McGee-James-Bullock love triangle demonstrates rather pointedly. Sure, James went for the all-American white bread candidate the first time, but we can’t assume anything about his future picks in women based on one single solitary case, an extremely limited sample if there ever was one. If we think he’ll go for another Bullock incarnation, then we’re committing the sampling fallacy (covered in lesson 6, if you’re taking Blueprint LSAT Prep).
When you’ve got a sample of some sort, three things have to happen: the sample has to be intelligibly related to any conclusions being made; the respondents cannot have to reason to lie (or be purposefully misled), and the sample has to be representative. If any of these conditions fails to be met, you’ve got a big old sampling fallacy on your hands. Here, the sample size is too small to know if the sample is representative. It turns out, (as US Weekly was so quick to show us), it wasn't.
by Jodi Triplett
Friday, July 16, 2010
Free LSAT Help in New York
Thursday, July 15, 2010
Start Studying for the October LSAT
So if you haven't already begun studying for the LSAT, now is the time to start!
by Jodi Triplett
Tuesday, July 6, 2010
The First LSAT Practice Exam
However, we also have students who increase their scores by 20 points or more. It all depends on how much effort you put into your studies.
by Jodi Triplett
Saturday, June 19, 2010
Starting an October LSAT Class Soon? Some Do's and Dont's.
The September/October LSAT is typically the largest of the four LSAT administrations during the year. This is because students can do the bulk of their studying during the summer, when they don't have pesky interferences like classes or spring break as a distraction. Most LSAT classes for this test begin in early to late July and we often have students asking us in June what they should do before class begins.
To that end, I've put together a list of what students should and shouldn't do before the start of LSAT class.
1. Take a break
You won’t get another rest without the LSAT hanging over your head between the time your course starts and the October LSAT, so head out to Ibiza/Greece/7-11 now. Fine-tune your late night disco dancing, watch re-runs of America's Next Top Model while eating beef jerky—whatever you want to accomplish for vacation for the summer; now is the time to do it.
2. Don’t open your LSAT books
Particularly for a Blueprint LSAT course, the first classes are the backbone of the class. This means that if you start without the benefit of a teacher, you’re covering the most important material on your own, and probably not comprehending it as well as you otherwise could. For video course students, don’t open your lesson books until you do so with the videos.
Don't forget that if you start doing homework before your course begins, you’re tackling real LSAT questions without a solid method of approach. The probability of tackling them incorrectly is thus much greater than if you had sat through your lesson first. In the end, you’re just wasting real LSAT questions.
3. Don’t take practice LSATs
You definitely want to set a baseline LSAT when you begin studying so that you can chart your improvement. However, taking a bunch of practice LSATs before you have a grasp on the methods for approaching the different question types is a bad idea. While you will build stamina by taking tests, you'll also be building bad habits by tackling questions you don’t know how to approach correctly. By waiting to take your practice exams deeper in the course, you'll be able to use the LSATs to diagnose weaknesses in your approach to particular questions and build stamina at the same time. So lay off the tests for now.
4. Read dense, academic articles
At Blueprint we've found that most students are the most apprehensive about logic games when they first come to class. While logic games are difficult, they're also a very learnable section of the exam. Students often struggle with improving their score in reading comprehension, on the other hand. This may be due to the fact that students come to class believing they already know how to read, thus discounting the difficulty of the section. From here, they don't learn the best method to approach reading comp and subsequently don't improve.
The place to begin improving in reading comprehension is to understand what it is you're reading. Taking the time to read dense, academic articles from sources like The Economist or New York Times feature articles will provide a good foundation for reading comprehension. It is also something you can do before LSAT class that won’t interfere with your LSAT class study.
So don't forget to rest while you can and if you simply must begin studying before class begins, some good reading between episodes of that America’s Next Top Model marathon should suffice. Now go forth and be fierce!
by Jodi Triplett